patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

HB 349 Passes General Assembly

HB 349 is a criminal justice reform package that was introduced at the behest of Governor Nathan Deal and included several pieces of legislation that Douglas County DA David McDade co-wrote and sponsored on behalf of the District Attorney Association of G

 

Many months of hard work by Douglas County District Attorney David McDade have been rewarded as the Georgia General Assembly has now voted to pass HB 349, a criminal justice reform package that was introduced at the behest of Governor Nathan Deal and included several pieces of legislation that McDade co-wrote and sponsored on behalf of the District Attorney Association of Georgia.

McDade’s role in the creation and development of this legislation comes about as a result of his work in several areas. First, he serves as Governor Deal’s appointee to the Criminal Justice Reform Council, which is the group responsible for making recommendations to the Governor on ways to improve the justice system. McDade also serves as the Chairman of the Legislative Affairs Committee of the District Attorney’s Association of Georgia. In that capacity he represents the interests of the entire prosecution community at the State Capitol, a position he has held for many years.

“All the credit for this legislation belongs to Governor Deal for his leadership in seeing to it that these improvements in the justice system become law,” said McDade. “Without his backing I doubt, seriously, that much, if any, of these improvements would have passed.”

McDade said he is most proud of the legislation that specifically expands the protections for children who witness abuse. Under this bill, prosecutors will have the authority to introduce statements made by those children to others describing what they saw and heard, thereby helping to ease the trauma and reduce the re-victimization of those children during court proceedings by hopefully reducing the amount of times they have to testify.

“Anytime we can help a victim, and in this case a child that witnesses abuse is certainly a victim of emotional and psychological abuse, we should do everything in our power to do so,” said McDade. “This bill is designed to do just that.”

Another critically important part of HB 349, according to McDade, is a provision that will allows the prosecution to appeal pre-trial rulings made to exclude evidence from the jury. Under this bill the State would be afforded the right to have a higher court review the ruling before the trial takes place, thereby making certain the ruling was proper. Currently the defendant is always given the ultimate opportunity to have a higher court review a judge’s ruling, whereas the prosecution is not.

“This law would allow us in certain limited situations to be given that same right,” said McDade. “While I do not see this as an issue that I routinely confronted with here locally, many prosecutors around the State feel that competent evidence of a defendant’s guilt is often excluded and that unless a pre-trial review of the decision is available, they are forced to go to trial without it and their victims suffer the consequences.”

While McDade was glad to have a part in HB 349, he acknowledged the Governor and top leaders at the Capitol are the ones responsible for the piece of legislation being passed.

“Again, all the credit belongs to the Governor and to the leadership at the Capitol for making this happen. I’m just fortunate and proud to have had a role in working with them on these changes that I honestly believe will help us help victims,” said McDade. 

Related Topics: David McDade and HB 349 Passes General Assembly

Bruce

4:55 pm on Saturday, March 23, 2013

An unattributed article, which means this was probably written by District Attorney McDade, which means he tells this like he wants to.

Wouldn't you like to have an article of your creation about any subject in the newspaper without having any attribution so that you don't have to reveal your own self-interests?

Wonder if this new legislation has any prison reform in it, which McDade has made clear he does not want. We will not know unless a REAL reporter reads the legislation and writes an unbiased report or, better, we read it ourselves.

The Sentinel, the Patch and every other paper should attribute all alleged news reports to an author and giving background info about the author.

Reply

Richard Segal

6:32 am on Sunday, March 24, 2013

"We will not know unless a REAL reporter reads the legislation and writes an unbiased report or, better, we read it ourselves."

You are right, you should read it yourself instead of relying on others to do it for you. Here it is:
http://www.legis.ga.gov/legislation/en-US/Display/20132014/HB/349.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Bruce

5:14 pm on Sunday, March 24, 2013

THANK YOU RICHARD! THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOu!

How brilliant to simply post the legislation so we can all click on and look at it!

You just taught the Patch and the Sentinel and the Atlanta Journal Constitution and the Marietta Daily Journal and every other news service a lesson. If there is a link, it should always be posted. AND EVERY AUTHOR SHOULD ADD THIS TO HIS STORY. GREAT! Thanks, Richard.

James Bell

11:38 am on Sunday, March 24, 2013

This is historic legislation. The reform package last year and this year indicates for the 1st time in our life time that the state accepts the fact that we can no longer afford to continue sending non-violent offenders to prison when local alternative are available. I applaud the efforts of Gov. Deal, the Criminal Justice Reform Council and the legislature for these reform measures. As the Council continues its work it should focus on eliminating mandatory minimum sentencing and give discretion back to judges - decriminalize person use amounts of marijuana by raising felony amounts to 2 or more ounce and making possession of less than 1 oz. a citation rather than a criminal offense Currently the law allows for a 10 year sentence in state prison for more that 28 grams (1-oz). If the state can reform sanctions for burglary and other crimes, marijuana reform should be considered. What do you think?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Bruce

5:16 pm on Sunday, March 24, 2013

OK James and Richard and Dash, the discussion has started and it is now not as McDade intended it to be. Now he is no longer in control, WE ARE.

Dash Riptide

12:43 pm on Sunday, March 24, 2013

It's a darn shame the bill takes away the right of the State to a direct appeal from the grant of defendant's motion for new trial, though.

Reply

James Bell

2:22 pm on Sunday, March 24, 2013

Dash - please explain to us peons.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Bruce

5:17 pm on Sunday, March 24, 2013

James, this may be what Dash is referring to. I copied it from the above article.

"Another critically important part of HB 349, according to McDade, is a provision that will allows the prosecution to appeal pre-trial rulings made to exclude evidence from the jury. Under this bill the State would be afforded the right to have a higher court review the ruling before the trial takes place, thereby making certain the ruling was proper. Currently the defendant is always given the ultimate opportunity to have a higher court review a judge’s ruling, whereas the prosecution is not.

“This law would allow us in certain limited situations to be given that same right,” said McDade. “While I do not see this as an issue that I routinely confronted with here locally, many prosecutors around the State feel that competent evidence of a defendant’s guilt is often excluded and that unless a pre-trial review of the decision is available, they are forced to go to trial without it and their victims suffer the consequences.”

Comment_arrow

Dash Riptide

5:39 pm on Sunday, March 24, 2013

5-7-1 (a) (7) ain't what it used to be.

Dash Riptide

5:43 pm on Sunday, March 24, 2013

It's not in the article because it wasn't done on purpose. Of course, the Senate version hasn't passed the House yet, article notwithstanding, so...

Reply

Leave a comment