County Responds to Criticism of Animal Shelter, New Director
The Douglas County Board of Commissioners responds to recent criticism of the Animal Shelter after hiring a new director and seeing two resignations.
(Editor's note: the following is a press release sent to Douglasville Patch today by the Douglas County Board of Commissioners.)
The Douglas County Animal Shelter/Animal Control Department has undergone many changes over the past year in an effort to increase the number of animal adoptions/decrease the euthanasia rate, provide better citizen service, and plan for the future.
The current Douglas County Animal Shelter was constructed in the mid-1980s to meet the needs of the suburban population of the County which was about 55,000 people. The Shelter had 20 dog kennels that could contain two dogs each, and 30 cat cages. A puppy room had the capacity of 16 small dog cage enclosures. The Animal Shelter was run by the independent not-for-profit Douglas County Humane Society to which Douglas County contributed funds to provide this service.
Outdoor sheltered dog areas were later added to handle larger breeds of dogs, but no significant changes have been made in the shelter since its original construction.
Douglas County took over operations of the Animal Shelter/Animal Control in 2004 and placed the operations under the direction of the Government Services Department. Animal populations continued to grow as residential population grew in the County. The 2010 Census estimate is 132,403.
It became obvious to Douglas County officials that the capacity for care for the animals coming into the Animal Shelter/Animal Control was being exceeded. Adoptions and placements through rescue organizations were being far outnumbered by the drop-offs at the Shelter and pick-ups by Animal Control. Due to the limited space at the Shelter after adoptions and transfers, the County had a fairly high euthanasia rate, particularly with sick animals, those considered to be unadoptable, and those considered unsociable. Government-run Animal Shelters do not have the option to turn away animals. When the Shelter is full, decisions have to be made. Euthanasia is a sad fact.
Douglas County established an Animal Control Advisory Board (ACAB) in 2007 to aid County officials in determining policies and procedures for the Shelter, and to aid in planning for an eventual new facility. The ACAB is composed of seven voting citizen members (5 appointed by the Douglas County Board of Commissioners and two by the City of Douglasville Mayor and Council) and a consultant veterinarian (non-voting). The ACAB is not a governing body, but exists to recommend action items to the Board of Commissioners. Very few such boards exist anywhere else in the State to provide such public involvement.
In 2012, the Board of Commissioners engaged the services of Life Line Animal Project to perform a comprehensive evaluation of Shelter and Animal Control operations. The document was presented to the ACAB and the Board of Commissioners in April and listed many positives and negatives. The evaluator, Susan Feingold, acted as temporary Shelter Manager during the evaluation and for a few months afterwards to begin the implementation of some of the actions.
In his 2012 State of the County address, Douglas County Commission Chairman Tom Worthan pledged to begin the process of planning a new Animal Shelter. Chairman Worthan created a lunch event for the State of the County and the proceeds from the lunch went to pay for half of the Life Line evaluation; the remaining half was funded by the Douglas County Humane Society. While the new shelter is being planned, the Board of Commissioners has and is making improvements to the existing Shelter and Animal Control, including improvements to the HVAC system, a new Road Officer truck ($35,000 with heating and cooling for the animals); a used Road Officer truck with conversions ($19,000); septic system improvements ($26,000), a new puppy room with the help of Leadership Douglas ($1,700), computers, ceiling tiles, light fixtures and other items. Microchip scanners will soon be placed on all Road Officer vehicles. A new two-way radio system is being installed for improved efficiency in responding to animal concerns; and staff will soon be in uniforms for public identification and professionalism.
In November 2012, after a Nationwide search, the Board of Commissioners employed Rick Smith as Animal Control Director. At that time, Animal Control became a designated stand-alone County department with its Director reporting directly to the County Administrator. This was done to give more direct and closer attention to the facility and programs by the County Administrator and Board of Commissioners. This may be unique because animal control facilities are usually placed under the direction and control of law enforcement or public health departments.
Director Smith had been previously employed since September 1979 by the City of St. Joseph, Missouri, as its Animal Control and Rescue Manager. He holds certifications in law enforcement from the City of St. Joseph; animal control from the Missouri Animal Control Association; and euthanasia certification training from the Humane Society of the United States. Mr. Smith was a Board Member of the Missouri Animal Control Association multiple times since 1979, and served in numerous offices in that organization. His Shelter was the recipient of the 2007 and 2009 Shelter of the Year Awards from the Missouri Animal Control Association. Mr. Smith wrote the first breeder and animal litter permit ordinances in the State of Missouri; started a pre-release adoption spay/neuter and vaccination program; established a 24-hour operation to meet the needs of the public; renovated the St. Joseph Animal Shelter; and developed standard operating procedures for the Shelter - all needs identified in the Life Line report. References for Mr. Smith included the Friends of the Animal Shelter who stated that he was an “animal welfare advocate always working to better the conditions for all animals” and the Missouri State Public Health Veterinarian who recommended “without any reservation his selection.”
The Life Line report and Director Smith’s initial observations noted that there was no strong direction being given at the Shelter and that employees and volunteers had no structure, management, or procedures. He began to implement management that did not sit well with two of the employees, and they resigned on their own accord and under no pressure to do so. A third employee resigned due to personal reasons that had nothing to do with Shelter operations. No employees were terminated. The employment vacancies have placed a strain on the Shelter’s functions until the positions are advertised and filled, and all current employees are working overtime. At present, there are 5 vacancies. All have been advertised and applicants are being interviewed at the present time.
Some of the duties of the personnel who resigned have had to be temporarily suspended, including the production of the “in danger” list of Shelter animals. Before the end of February, the “in danger” list will again be available to the public through a weekly posting on the Animal Shelter page of the Douglas County web site, www.CelebrateDouglasCounty.com; the list will be posted no later than Wednesday of each week, but usually on Tuesdays. These are not animals that automatically will be euthanized if not adopted, but have reasons to be on the list, such as length of time at the Shelter, condition, etc.
The euthanization rate for the Douglas County Animal Shelter in 2012 was approximately 16 percent. The County Administrator has instructed Director Smith to keep this rate as low as possible. Current euthanizations have been limited to un-rescued feral cats which have been in isolation, rabies specimen dogs, and sick animals.
Last year (2012), a total of 3,187 animals were in the Douglas County Animal Shelter. Of that number, 38 percent were adopted; 33 percent went to rescue agencies; 11 percent were returned to their owner; and 16 percent were euthanized. The euthanization rate in Cherokee County last year was 57 percent, and about 30 percent in Henry County. Nationally, approximately 60 percent of dogs and 70 percent of cats are euthanized.
Some Shelter functions, such as kennel cleaning and pet exercise, are currently being done with Community Service workers. An organization for volunteers is in the formative stages, and the new organization will have structure and specific duties for volunteers, as opposed to volunteers showing up at unspecified, unscheduled times for uncoordinated contributions of time and effort. There are necessary tasks that need to be daily performed and volunteers can help with these tasks but there needs to be a calendar, an assignment of responsibility, and a definitive completion. Volunteers are also being recruited to host off-site pet adoption events for the Shelter. Best management practices require an orderly and much-needed volunteer effort that addresses training of volunteers, education, community outreach and coordination of efforts to benefit the animals - not personal egos. Director Smith’s wife, Cynthia, has volunteered many unpaid hours to help put together the organization. Mrs. Smith has extensive experience with the formation of this type of support group and her expertise will be invaluable in getting the new volunteer organization running in a short time period.
The hours for public visitation to the Shelter for animal adoptions were modified to be more citizen-friendly and to give the staff more time to clean and care for the animals. A review of the hours in effect was made to choose which were popular and which had low or no attendance. Sunday hours were extended. The weekday hours were set so that the actual kennel personnel - the staff who know and work daily with each animal - will be available to work with the public for adoptions and rescues personally and answer all questions. The Shelter is open on Tuesday and Thursday nights until 6:30 p.m. to facilitate visitation and adoptions for those persons who work until 5 p.m.
The County has brought in two classroom trailers so that the cramped quarters of the Shelter can be temporarily alleviated. The trailers were modified to be ADA-compliant and Code-compliant as required by law. One of the trailers will house the offices for the director and the road officers, and the other will be used for storage. This will allow more room for the animals in the shelter, and allow for more separation between animals for sanitation and disease control.
The Douglas County Board of Commissioners continues its location planning and facility research for a new animal shelter. The Commissioners have visited other shelters in Georgia and are weighing the merits of each to design the best shelter for the County’s needs. The Commissioners anticipate placing a referendum on the November 2013 ballot for the residents to decide if bonds should be issued for the construction of a new animal shelter. The estimated cost is $4 million.
The County is striving to take the Shelter to a professional level and adhere to the “Guidelines for Standards of Care in Animal Shelters”, and that requires change. Due in part to the unstructured management and operation of the Animal Shelter prior to Director Smith’s arrival, there are individuals who no longer have “their way” at the Shelter. Two were the employees who resigned; others are volunteers; one was a member of the ACAB, Mr. Carl Pyrdum, Jr.
As a member of the ACAB, Mr. Pyrdum was instrumental in bringing needs of the Animal Shelter to the attention of the Board of Commissioners and his service was appreciated. However, Mr. Pyrdum openly challenged Director Smith after his employment and the County because Mr. Pyrdum no longer could have “his way” at the Shelter. Mr. Pyrdum does not like the new Shelter hours, and Mr. Pyrdum does not like the new structure for volunteers. He is openly hostile and has been threatening to Director Smith, other employees, other members of the ACAB, and to the public who support the changes. In addition, Mr. Pyrdum has solicited local businesses and animal welfare agencies to stop supporting the County and its Animal Shelter and to instead support his personal efforts. Mr. Pyrdum’s efforts, were they to be successful, would hurt the animals by increasing the euthanasia rate. The Board of Commissioners relieved Mr. Pyrdum of his ACAB appointment since the County is going in a different direction than Mr. Pyrdum desires. Mr. Pyrdum is a former law enforcement officer with the City of Atlanta Police Department who regularly relates to others that he carries a pistol and is not afraid to use it. He has posted videos on his blog opposing City of Atlanta policies.
Mr. Pyrdum has posted on numerous Internet blogs and other social media petitions and information in an effort to have Director Smith fired. These on-line postings and petitions have resulted in massive misinformation being distributed, and also threats to Director Smith, including the threat of personal harm. hese threats have been forwarded to the appropriate law enforcement agency.
Many threats came after the Board of Commissioners recently adopted the State of Georgia’s “Responsible Dog Ownership Law”, a requirement of local governments if local animal control officials are to enforce it. Some of the language in the law seems ambiguous, and the County’s legal staff asked Director Smith to review it and provide feedback to the ACAB. He authored suggestions to the local ordinance to particularly clarify how a dog could be declared “dangerous.” The amendments were not breed-specific, and proposed clarification that would limit some dogs, due to their actions, from being declared “dangerous.” The declaration of a dog as “dangerous” does not mean euthanization. Director Smith’s suggestions have to go through the ACAB, which would hear/modify/reject the proposal, and make a recommendation on it to the Board of Commissioners. There is also a judicial review provision in the existing State law that precludes Director Smith from making unilateral decisions on “dangerous” dogs. The ordinance review process is only in the beginning stages with the ACAB and may result in no changes to the local Ordinance at all.
Emails and telephone messages received by the Board of Commissioners complain about everything from the German Shepherd breed being declared “dangerous” by Director Smith (no dog has yet been declared “dangerous” and no breed can be declared “dangerous”) to feral cats not being allowed to be viewed by the public (feral cats are wild and can attack).
The ACAB and the Board of Commissioners are committed to moving forward in a positive direction with the Douglas County Animal Shelter and Animal Control Department. Constructive criticism is appreciated; viral misinformation and personal attacks due to the loss of influence and control are not and will not be tolerated. Director Smith has the strong support of the Board of Commissioners and many local animal welfare advocates.
_________________________________
Responses to Specific Allegations Received by Douglas County
Allegation: Douglas County spent $5,000 for a private rest room and shower for Director Smith in the renovated classroom trailer set up for offices at the Animal Shelter.
Response: The classroom trailers are required to be in compliance with the American for Disabilities Act and local and State Building Codes. A rest room with shower was installed in the office trailer and is accessible to the public who visit the trailer. The rest room will be used by all staff, including Road Officers and Kennel staff who may need to shower after working with the animals and being sprayed on. The $5,000 figure is roughly the total cost of siting the trailers, building the ADA-required ramps, plumbing, electrical and general modifications to convert the space into offices.
Allegation: Director Smith reduced the number of cages in the Shelter and therefore the number of animals able to be housed in the Shelter.
Response: Some temporary wire cages were removed due to their unacceptability in controlling aerosol diseases (i.e., upper respiratory infections) and due to their non-compliance with the “Guidelines for Standards of Care in Animal Shelters” because of health risks to animals.
Allegation: Director Smith no longer provides a weekly “in danger” list to animal welfare advocates and rescue organizations.
Response: Due to the resignations of staff members whose responsibility it was to develop the “in danger” list, it was not produced for a couple of weeks. The “in danger” list is now being posted weekly on the Animal Control Department page of the Douglas County web site, www.CelebrateDouglasCounty.com, and on the Animal Control Department’s facebook page with allowances and encouragement for ”sharing.”
Allegation: The hours for public visitation/adoption at the Animal Shelter have been reduced.
Response: Shelter hours were changed so that (1) the kennel staff would have sufficient time to clean kennels, feed animals, exercise the animals, and interact with them in the mornings before the public arrived; and (2) the kennel staff who know the animals best would be available during public hours to help the public with adoptions and provide to the new owners specific knowledge on the animals due to the time they spent with them in the mornings. Shelter hours were analyzed for low and no visitation times, and those days with higher attendance had times extended.
Allegation: Mr. Smith is unqualified and was given his job because he is related to another County employee.
Response: Director Smith is eminently qualified for the position and is not related to any County employee.
Allegation: Mr. Smith canceled a sponsorship program for vetting animals.
Response: Sponsorships are welcome to pay for the expenses of spay/neutering animals. However, the sponsors cannot put conditions on their sponsorship such as infinite stay at the Shelter, to whom the animal can be adopted, etc.
A related Douglasville Patch article:
Controversy Rages Over New Animal Shelter Director
Douglasville Patch blogs written by Carl Pyrdum:
New Animal Services Director Moves into Adversarial Posture, Shelter Sees 2 Recent Resignations
Mike Gamel
12:41 pm on Thursday, February 14, 2013
I think the commisioners still need to listen to the people. For the county to come out with this press release tell me that there are obvious issues with the animal shelter. Listen to the people that put you in office because these same people can vote you out.
SLK
5:25 pm on Thursday, February 14, 2013
WHAT A BUNCH OF HOEY, I'd prefer to use 4-letter words, but will be polite. You people at the board are still a bunch of money crunching, lying, excusing idiots.
I will NOT VOTE FOR ANY OF YOU next election; and you all should be removed from office NOW.
Amazing .. how much time you spent to 'justify' your BS. You people should have nightmares at night when you're trying to sleep, thinking about your and your relatives and neighbors little pets.
You people are horrible. I've lived in Douglas Co for 14+ years and have loved it here, but NOW, I'm afraid of the kind of BS you people are throwing around; making excuses, throwing out 'figures,' and plain BS.
Commissioners: SHAME AGAIN ON YOU, GET RID OF RICK SMITH NOW!!!!!!!!!!!
As a responsible law abiding, tax payer who has pets and keeps them safe and lawful, you are insulting my intelligence with this crappy response.
S. Knight
Gerald Ingle
1:08 pm on Thursday, February 14, 2013
In paragraph 5, the BOC state that the Government-run shelter has a "fairly high" euthanasia rate, but then later on states that the 2012 rate was 16%, much lower than Henry and Cherokee counties, and drastically lower than the nationwide rate. I would argue the euthanasia rate and the budget should be the sole metrics that DC government should consider when evaluating the Shelter. I truly don't understand all the changes when the 2012 rate was so low. Why lay all the blame on those who don't have a taxpayer-funded body (BOC) to defend (and protect) them? Surely Mr. Smith has moved too fast, too soon in making unnecessary changes for the Douglas County Animal Shelter and he and the BOC bear responsibility in letting good employees leave........
Rebekah Mattox
1:09 pm on Thursday, February 14, 2013
Right, M. Gamel! Am I overlooking the author of this article? I have always known Carl to show restraint, to be solely about animal welfare, and it appears he could have a defamation law suit now based on this article. Further, public statements by the two resigned managers reveal that in no way is Mr. Smith blame-less! In not releasing an in-danger-list, a REASON could have been given AT THE TIME instead of implications of hatefulness.The progress made last year & the 16% kill rate is NOT due to Mr. Smith but rather to Mike & Tracy who need to b invited back w/an apology.. Because Carl has been vocal & visible in his observations has made him a scapegoat! In no way is there a valid reason that he should have been dismissed from the advisory board. While changes of hours is not a major negative issue, present TONE at the shelter IS a major negative issue. In no way can all the problems be due to Carl having "his way," & in an article like this, SLANG is NOT acceptable--in other words, what does having "his way" MEAN? Mr. Smith could use training in diplomacy & progreesive leadership skills as could the commissioners.
Cyd
1:43 pm on Thursday, February 14, 2013
For those who have attempted to make logical reasonable comments and have been attacked by these individuals for doing so. I have read your comments and I appreciate them. Thank you!
Cyd
1:37 pm on Thursday, February 14, 2013
Thank you, Douglas County Commissioners, ACAB, Shelter Staff, HOPE (Helping Orphan Pets Everywhere) in Douglas County volunteers, The Douglas County Humane Society, Rescues that continue to work with DCAC and the many individuals that came out to the shelter to see the truth for themselves instead of getting caught up in the drama of lies. I am very greatfull for all of you! Cynthia Smith
Rebekah Mattox
3:22 pm on Sunday, February 17, 2013
Whose DRAMA? And WHOSE LIES?
Cyd
1:46 pm on Thursday, February 14, 2013
For positive information focusing on shelter animals and DCAC and off-site adoption events please see the volunteer facebook page of HOPE in Douglas County.
Chiggerbug
2:00 pm on Thursday, February 14, 2013
There is nothing ambiguous in the wording of the new GA Dangerous Dog Law. It is very clear in its wording.
And, Rick Smith is not without blame in spouting off threats. The lady whose German Shepherd was the first dog to have fallen under the new law adopted by the county in December, had her dog impounded for 30 days in December, then has had 2 court hearings. Before the second hearing, Rick Smith called her house and threatened her that "he was going to have the judge declare her dog vicious, so that he could put her to sleep". How unprofessional was that? Since when do law enforcement officers have the right to call and harass you and threaten you and your dog? Thank goodness that she only received a fine, and she has agreed to put up a fence and hire a trainer. And thank goodness that Rick Smith did not get to kill her dog, like he wanted. This case was the catalyst for the changes that Rick Smith wanted to make to the newly adopted law. I think the law worked very well for the citizen, but not so well for the pink juice happy government official.
As far as him being certified by the H$U$ to perform an euthanasia, I am sorry, but they have no authority to certify anyone. They are a scam organization that collects as much money as they can, and distributes as little as it can to the animals in need.
And as far as who needs to be dismissed from the AAB, it should be the Chairman, as she has no clue how to run a meeting, or what their intended purpose is to be.
Rebekah Mattox
2:03 pm on Thursday, February 14, 2013
Gerald I. is correct in describing the "TOO FAST" changes. For example, volunteerism was working & did not need the micro-managing. Micro-managing will continue to compound Smith's irratability whereas he could have stepped into the flow of what was going well including the job performances of Mike & Tracy. And to say that CARL CONVINCED "Southern Hope" to pull its support of the free spay-neuter program is quite an exageration. Commissioners still need to listen to the citizens. The petitions get support from people who are not DC citizens due to the fact that volunteers have done a diligent service of networking. And to blame Carl for the THREATS simply an un-intelligent attempt at diverting from real concerns. Nobody agrees w/those threats from OUTSIDE THE USA, but also, nobody agrees w/elected officials minimalizing & even ignoring the electorate.
S. R. Shelton
2:36 pm on Thursday, February 14, 2013
For those who don't know, "Cyd" is Rick Smith's wife, Cindy. She is the one who heads the "HOPE" group.
SLK
5:33 pm on Thursday, February 14, 2013
Anyone related to Rick Smith who's been voted into a role at the shelter is an IDIOT. Period. I don't care if her name is Cindy, or CYD, or Sicko. THEY both need to be out and NOW.
what happened to the organization of a protest? Is that still on, or do we have to wait until next election to eliminate these idiots on the board, including Rick Smith?
OMG, this has become an amazing nightmare for those of us who love our little pets. All of mine have come from DC animal shelter throughout the last 14years, including 3 cats (and one who disappeared).
charlene elliott
9:45 pm on Thursday, February 14, 2013
Thanks...makes sense now!!!
animal lover all the way
3:41 pm on Thursday, February 14, 2013
I think its all politics..and yes those who voted you in can definitely make sure that does not happen again. .to tell a road officer to pick up as many animals as possible and not worry about the daily tasks of taking care of animlas is awful. If the county can't see a problem in its early stages then not only are the animals doomed but so are the owners.Everyone deserves the right to have a pet protect their home.the police have vicious dogs and I don't see them being put down.I have worked closely with T.Thompson when she was in PAC, and there is not one thing I could ever say bad about her or her care and professionalism.if it was bad enough for her to leave knowing the danger the animals were in then it must be Really bad. ..I hope for everyones sake the matters get fixed and we get the staff back in there that cares and loves their job.
Janice Goad
3:49 pm on Thursday, February 14, 2013
People keep indicating Smith has gotten death threats, etc., which is a stupid thing to do under any circumstances. But I was at the "special called meeting" of the Advisory Board a couple of weeks ago and the only threatening talk I heard was from Smith himself. He asked if anyone was taping the proceedings, and a couple of people indicated they were -- Carl Pyrdum (still on the Board at that time) being one of them. Smith then indicated that he just wanted to know because he'd gotten some threats and now that he knew who was taping the meeting, he'd know "who to go to" if he got any more! Is it rational thinking to equate a tape recorder with a death threat? Good Lord, OF COURSE Carl took exception to that comment, and who wouldn't? Smith completely ignored the other people in the voiceless audience who were also taping the meeting and focused his attention directly at Carl. So I'm not convinced that Smith isn't blustering and bullying his way about with the volunteers and employees at the same time he's whining to the commissioners that people are threatening him. Today's press release from the commissioners convinces me even more that they will continue to cling to their poorly-reasoned choice for a shelter manager for no other reason than it's THEIR CHOICE! The commissioners don't listen to their constituents because they're too busy listening to the voice in their head saying "You're great, you're always right and those people who put you here are NOTHING."
SLK
5:35 pm on Thursday, February 14, 2013
Smith is an animal hater, a "Hitler." Period. You people on the board are crooked, and more so .. very stupid.
Rebekah Mattox
6:50 pm on Thursday, February 14, 2013
I fear Smith is indeed a bully and his sweet, adorable wife might very well be a victim herself. Smith does not appear open to continued learning & growth. Carl has established his reputation as one of integrity and awesome animal advocacy, so it seems that very likely Smith wrote this article & that leadership are ALL puzzlingly believeing a new person, Smith, over one with an established good reputation. Nobody agrees w/the death threats which were from outside the USA, BUT ALSO NOBODY AGREES WITH BULLYING and lack of hospitatlity and manners and with elected officials NOT being transparent and NOT adhering to the electorate.
Marcie
3:55 pm on Thursday, February 14, 2013
If the Euth. rate raises under Mr. Smith's watch, who will be held accountable? What excuses will our County government make? Our Commissioners hired a man who euthanized roughly 70,000 animals in his 30 yr tenure in MO. This is a fact and admitted by Mr. Smith in a newspaper article. Or, are you going to say this is an allegation also? As previous posters stated, it is time you listen to "We The People". I have been a resident of DC since 1988 and am disgusted with the complete disdain our Commissioners have for their voters. YOU work for us and WE pay your salary and we will remember.
Rebekah Mattox
6:51 pm on Thursday, February 14, 2013
I fear that the kill rate numbers will never be honestly reported. Already. last week, the records were full of errors regarding what pets lived & which were killed.
McTyre Locksmith
4:09 pm on Thursday, February 14, 2013
I am truly disgusted that YET again the real situation is THERE IS A PROBLEM, it is not a bunch of people just complaining, it is people with real concerns that have issues with how this facility is being managed. If you have followed this situation from the beginning you can clearly see there is a real issue here. One is which that these animals will not have a choice. Agency's have pulled there services due to the lack of progression to which will effect every animal that enters the facility. Writing the chairmen have become hopeless due to the lack of interest of anyone trying to shed light on what is going on. I have nothing to gain for this and yet to see this ignorance of lack of importance is rather disturbing. There is a problem a huge problem, we have Mr. Smiths wife posting under factitious names which reminds me that I am back in high school with a bunch of teenagers. It is time to investigate the facility and investigate if these allegations can be true. Sitting in a chair and reading emails will not correct this situation. It is called getting off your ass and literally doing something about it. There is a problem and I cannot understand why this is not being addressed properly.
Rebekah Mattox
6:54 pm on Thursday, February 14, 2013
McTyre: Reports are that the shelter will give accusations of loitering unless volunteers submit to the new beauracratic process.
ohno
4:23 pm on Thursday, February 14, 2013
Why doesn't it mentioned who wrote this article?
SLK
5:44 pm on Thursday, February 14, 2013
GREAT QUESTION ohno, I wondered that too. COWARDS. This is not a bunch of illogical emotional crap, we are speaking out as citizens of this county against a horrendous bunch of bureaucrats that I thought we're good people, until now.
I SWEAR, I will never vote for you Tom Worthan, and perhaps any of his croonies, ever again as long as I live in this county. Listen to the people ..
GET RID OF THAT RICK SMITH IDIOT. Our community and pet's welfare are at the center of this, you nitwit. Not about money, kickbacks, who knows what else? You're a bunch of crooks! You guys are starting to sound/look like those idiots on the east side of Atlanta in DeKalb/Fulton county, etc. ... crooks. Why should Douglas Co. citizens trust you now?
Pat Evans
5:54 pm on Thursday, February 14, 2013
(Editor's note: the following is a press release sent to Douglasville Patch today by the Douglas County Board of Commissioners.)
If you'll look just prior to the article, it states this is from the BOC...we just don't know which one wrote it as they did not sign their name.
ohno
5:59 pm on Thursday, February 14, 2013
I understand, Pat Evans. But someone writing press releases would and should never use some of the language that's used in this article, which is why I asked. No govt agency would or should ever speak in the "personal" and antagonistic tone of this press release -- talking about "egos" and similar things. It sounds like something going on between high school cliques versus business. To me, it clearly illustrates the unprofessional, and I guess the best thing I can come up with is technically immature, way that this situation is being handled.
Rebekah Mattox
6:54 pm on Thursday, February 14, 2013
OHNO: I THINK THE AUTHOR SHOULD BE IDENTIFIED!!!!!!!!!!!!!
ohno
4:30 pm on Thursday, February 14, 2013
Shelter directors and staff change all the time and there are gripes here and there. But for the county to turn a blind eye to the public outcry that's going on here is just shameful.
And why does HOPE's facebook page only have five facebook fans? The same number of facebook fans it's had for like 6 weeks? Does that not tell you anything. It proves unequivocally that there is little to no effort, and possibly no experience, in marketing, networking and intelligent, compassionate effort on the part of these animals. Talk about egos!
Most rescue facebook pages come online for any shelter and within a few days, they have at least 1,000 fans. This, to me, speaks volumes, since most rescues use facebook heavily as a resource to save homeless pets.
Joanie Wilson
4:40 pm on Thursday, February 14, 2013
I went to the shelter to take treats and make sure they didnt have my neighbors dog.Iwas told when I questioned a couple of the staff that they all had to sign releases and was not able to discuss anything about Mr. Smith..Okay WOW!!!Who does he think he is,the shelter had two community service workers,the cages were horrible,Douglas County Commissioners Voters Put You In ,We Can Vote You Out!!!!!!!!!!1
ohno
5:22 pm on Thursday, February 14, 2013
I like how the article cherry picks which allegations to which they responded. The list is much, much longer...
Pat Evans
5:33 pm on Thursday, February 14, 2013
I'd like to know why Mr. Rick Smith can't speak for himself? Why do others have to speak for him, i.e., the County BOC, ACAB, and Rick's wife, Cynthia (Cyd) ? Is he not capable of addressing the complaints himself?
Why does his agenda (his idea of the future) for the DCAS have to be so secretive?
Seriously, yes there are major issues ongoing at DCAS. I have been there myself and felt the difference,..you could cut the atmosphere with a knife now. This also not to mention the animals seem to be intimated too instead of super friendly like before when Tracy and the regular "un-managed" volunteers were there.
Lisa Levesque
6:13 am on Friday, February 15, 2013
You are so right Pat. I have seen the stressed looks of the shelter staff (who once wore smiles and enjoyed the lifesaving efforts underway), since Rick Smith arrived. Who wouldn't be stressed with the director's wife (Cynthia, Cyd, Syd) lording over you and the oppressive tension that now wreaks through the building. The animals no doubt feel this lack of compassion too...how sad for the staff and animals.
Pat Evans
5:41 pm on Thursday, February 14, 2013
Another thing...is the Author of this article reading these responses? If so, care to share or address the comments?
Mike Pope
6:57 pm on Thursday, February 14, 2013
If you notice, some of the same language that is written in this article has the same words that is posted on the fb page and county website. Guess who wrote that and posted it on the Animal Shelter page?
SLK
5:48 pm on Thursday, February 14, 2013
I don't know how to do this, but I say we should call for a state wide/federal investigation.
The ASPCA should get involved.
There are illegal things going on here, involving county and perhaps state officials.
This is UNACCEPTABLE.
Anyone have suggestions as to who we could email, i.e. county, state, government, aspca officials for an investigation?
I think money is involved in this crap.
Rebekah Mattox
6:58 pm on Thursday, February 14, 2013
Maybe by beginning w/the group that did the shelter evaluation which I believe is LIFELINE. Now I see why Tom Worthan did not write a single note when we met w/him w/Ms. Cheryl as our main group speaker--Worthan was only acting concerned because it was election year.
Cyd
8:59 am on Friday, February 15, 2013
You can go to the ASPCA's website and click on contact information and contact them. Let them know what you guys say is going on and have them come on out. Problem though what if they don't agree with you?
Deborah Carter
5:57 pm on Thursday, February 14, 2013
It seems Mr. Smith was the "cheapest" man for the job, so they hired him without checking his back ground. Now they are in a mess and don't want to admit they're wrong. Have the officials even been to the shelter to check things out? I doubt it because they do not care. If you can't listen to your citizens then you also need to be fired! I also can't believe they would insult the people responsible for saving animals. Do they really think that anyone that has had anything to do with that shelter believes them? I agree with Mr. Locksmith, get off your butt and check things out and get rid of The Hitler for animals.
HHA
6:58 pm on Thursday, February 14, 2013
Wow, I have no personal relation to any involved in this mess but I have to say- I am shocked and embarrassed that my County Commissioners would release such an unprofessional and antagonistic letter such as this one. The last few paragraphs literally had my mouth open in shock. This seems a poor attempt at damage control, when in fact it just added fuel to the flames.
Does Rick Smith have a contract? We know the almighty dollar is the biggest motivator. I wonder if the county is so hell bent on keeping him just to save money and their pride.
Lori
7:13 pm on Thursday, February 14, 2013
Yes, Smith has a one-year contract. Just who's "egos" are a problem here? I'd say it would be the Commissioners of Douglas County.
Lisa Levesque
6:59 pm on Thursday, February 14, 2013
I find our county commissioners acts disgraceful. Is this the way they intend to treat concerned citizens going forward? Speak out against them, and they will subject you to character assassination based on their "facts" as they decide to spin them? Are they so incapable of LISTENING to concerned citizens that they prefer to vilify them instead?
Lisa Levesque
7:07 pm on Thursday, February 14, 2013
" Government-run Animal Shelters do not have the option to turn away animals. When the Shelter is full, decisions have to be made. Euthanasia is a sad fact."
This is simply false. Under Susan Feingold/LifeLine, the shelter repeatedly turned away owner surrenders. I know, I witnessed them doing so. I also was also present at the Animal Control Advisory Board meeting when they discussed the benefit this had in reducing the kennel population, as the owners were being directed to contact the Douglas County Humane Society for help and/or referred to a rescue that might help them.
Lisa Levesque
7:23 pm on Thursday, February 14, 2013
As for "euthanasia," the only reason Rick Smith will kill healthy and adoptable dogs, cats, puppies, and kittens, is because he chooses to do so. That 16% "euthanasia" rate that the county likes to boast about is a direct result of the hard work of dedicated volunteers...volunteers like Carl Pyrdum...as well as rescues and caring shelter staff. Rick Smith had nothing to do with it, but he 70,000 dead animals in his wake don't lie! http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2-17199565.html Why would the county commissioners hire a man with this record?
Lori
7:11 pm on Thursday, February 14, 2013
The Board of Commissioners and Mr. Smith seem to have a warped sense of the meaning of professionalism. This press release is nothing more than pathetic and over the line in its attempt to trash a citizen and taxpayer, Mr. Pyrdum, along with the other volunteers and staff responsible for the amazing 16% euthanasia rate in 2012. The Animal Shelter was being run professionally and according to recommendations by the Lifeline study with on-going improvements before the hiring of Smith. To insinuate otherwise is a COWARDLY attempt at covering their mistake of hiring Smith with his antiquated policies and 70,000 kill history. A strong volunteer and rescue base has now been ousted and headed by his wife who knows nothing of the animals, volunteers, rescues, networking or previous workings that were so effective. By their own admission on their Facebook page they are "starting over." The Shelter is now going backwards (but has a new shower!?) Board of Commissioners, Mr. Smith and your EGOS, you have certainly shown the citizens what you are made of.
Lori
7:19 pm on Thursday, February 14, 2013
I also find it laughable that the Board of Commissioners would put any credence into the opinion of the Douglas County Humane Society who is backing Smith. This is the same group who WALKED OUT on the Animal Control Shelter when under their operation in 2004 over money disputes, leaving the county animals abandoned.
Lisa Levesque
7:30 pm on Thursday, February 14, 2013
The responses above also fail to note the reduction in space for the dogs, and the reference to the reduction in hours contradicts what Tom Worthan stated for the reason in his recent Lithia Springs town hall: I don't have the exact quote, but when asked by a concerned citizen he referenced budget restrictions.
Also, this is not about the volunteers wanting "their way," but about lifesaving efforts that have proven successful, which Rick Smith has dismantled while county commissioners turn a deaf ear to concerned citizens.
Lisa Levesque
7:38 pm on Thursday, February 14, 2013
There are so many issues, but most disturbing to me is my concern that an increased number of animals are going to suffer an unnecessary fate (death) under the direction of Rick Smith. I noted at the November Animal Control Advisory Board meeting that we had significantly reduced our kill rate in the county, and i asked him what he brought to the table to continue the trend. He used a lot of words, but actually said very little...now, I know why. How tragic for our community and the animals.
Angelica Maria Almeyda
7:45 pm on Thursday, February 14, 2013
I find it appalling that in these times elected public officials slander a retired law enforcement officer who seeks to save innocent lives using to their political advantage the topic of gun ownership made contentious through horrific incidents. Clearly they have as little compassion for human lives as they do for dogs and cats. The euthanization rate of 16% for 2012 they highly tout is the result of the hard work of staff and volunteers that are no longer able to work at the shelter, due to actions of the new director. Please continue doing amazing work and distribute this petition http://ow.ly/hFiGl as widely as possible while continuing this struggle renewed in its importance and urgency
Jessica Grimes
8:13 pm on Thursday, February 14, 2013
I agree 100% with you Angelica! also signed the petition! They are now trying to make those around them doing the GOOD WORK for the animals look bad to take the attention off the incredibly obvious ignorance they have when it comes to saving the lives of these animals! It is pretty simple, you make a mistake admit it, fix it and move on to do better and LEARN from it! These "good ol boys" think they are to good for that.
Karen Orgeron
8:13 pm on Thursday, February 14, 2013
The individual who wrote this did not even have the guts to own it. I guess it makes it easier to lie and attack. Carl is well spoken and polite and has worked tirelessly for the animals. I cannot see that Carl "got his way" before. There were many times that actions were taken at the shelter that people were not pleased about but he supported the shelter, the people working there and pointed to the fact that they had rules they had to follow. This article appears to be filled with lies and does seem slanderous. The article implies that Mr. Smith has something to do with the low rate last year. It blames the staff resigning on the new "structure" which everyone knows is not true and it blames the loss of support from animal welfare agencies on Carl when the loss was due to actions taken by Mr. Smith. I know that Carl and other volunteers would never do anything to take resources for rescue away from the animals. The truth will and is coming out. However, in the mean time I fear for the animals. I am sure Mr Smith will only hire people who will do his bidding. As of the 15th of this month all volunteer applications expire and only members of the "Hope" nonprofit group (Cyd - Mr. Smith's wife) will be allowed to volunteer. That should make it even easier for Mr. Smith to carry out his agenda with no checks and balance. The commissioners have done the people and the animals of Douglas County are real disservice. This whole thing sickens me.
Melanie
8:32 pm on Thursday, February 14, 2013
Appalling and disgusting is all I can say....... shame on the BOC for allowing and condoning the actions of the new director
Rebekah Mattox
3:29 pm on Sunday, February 17, 2013
Melanie, you're right, & it seems that the DCHS is condoning the BOC and shamimg & shunning HS volunteers who do NOT want to reinforce the surreptition & corruption. THE DCHS is declining to put in writing what they want to say to volunteers ["Please call"], nor will they MEET in person: WHY?
Patrick Edinger
9:04 pm on Thursday, February 14, 2013
Rick Smith is a coward
Susan Lance
10:06 pm on Thursday, February 14, 2013
In the last year I have been part of a grassroot effort led by Tammy and Carl Pyrdum, and Lisa Levesque. This effort involved dozens of people and relied on the good will of the volunteers and the shelter staff (Tracy and Mike especially)-- THEY are the reason the euthanasia rate went from 40% to 16%-- the Commissioners and the Douglas County Humane Society played NO role. The fact that Mr. Smith could not join in that effort and capitalize on the hard work and foundation laid by this group is evidence he does not have the best interest of the animals or the citizens of Douglas County in mind. Tthe exodus of key staff so quickly in a manager's tenure is a sign of very poor managerial skills. I find the slander of Carl Pyrdum the most objectionably part of this article-- he and Tammy have done nothing but spend much of their time (and probably money) trying to save as many animals as possible from the shelter. They have enlisted a small army of people from all over Georgia and beyond in this effort. I hope the Commissioners will come to see how destructive their hiring decision was and remove Mr. Smith from his post.
Angelica Maria Almeyda
11:03 pm on Thursday, February 14, 2013
FYI you can voice your concerns at Randi Travis FOX 5 FB page as well.
Rebekah Mattox
11:40 pm on Thursday, February 14, 2013
Why is Rick Smith continuing to put his wife through all this stress? Why was it advantageous for him to move here?????
Lisa Levesque
5:22 am on Friday, February 15, 2013
Rebekah, Rick Smith's wife is no victim here either, as she plays an active role in promoting his agenda.
Lisa Levesque
5:24 am on Friday, February 15, 2013
Douglas County Commissioners need to own THEIR LIES...here a HUGE LIE from their "press release" is exposed: https://www.facebook.com/notes/furbabies-of-dcas-animals-in-douglas-county-shelter-douglasville-georgia/when-the-shelter-is-full-decisions-have-to-be-made-can-government-run-animal-she/601239363223969 Please read and share.
Janice Goad
9:06 am on Friday, February 15, 2013
I can hardly wait to see how the Commish spins THIS fact. Amazing how much effort they're putting into defending this POS man they've hired. Too bad they didn't put that much effort into finding a REAL shelter manager. Oh, wait, they had one -- but they preferred Smith. That tells you something about them, doesn't it?
Jane Smith
9:27 am on Friday, February 15, 2013
How about opening your eyes to the real issue here! We have animals that are in great need of a good home..How about focus on that instead of the blame game! Post the pictures of the animals up for adoption on your personal Facebook page and help with getting them adopted! Mom of two very happy rescue dogs!
Lori
10:01 am on Friday, February 15, 2013
These folks spend hours doing exactly that and continue to do so to save the animals, harder than ever. It's a crying shame that Douglas County decided to throw this wrench into the proven success and progression of our shelter.
Rebekah Mattox
2:02 pm on Saturday, February 16, 2013
JANE smith: The shelter volunteers along w/Mike & Tracy progressed to a 16% kill rate but now MR. smith has dismantled everything that was already working. AND YES, pictures ARE STILL being posted, BUT MR. smith NOT Carl has repelled the involvement of progressive groups & individuals. Animals r sensitive, much like children, so it is awful that the animals r captive there to experience the tone--the atmosphere of strife ["playing the victim"] & negativity. Whoever hired MR. smith did not know how to go thru a progressive, constructive hiring process [for 1 thing, WHY was Smith's 55% kill rate NOT a concern?], and now, the question persists: WHY was a move from MO. a desireable choice? AND WHY r the commissioners & HS NOT being supportive of voters and proven sincere advocates? The BULLY TONE is now prevalent AGAINST voters & advocates. Mulcare repeats that NOBODY ELSE cares except for animal advocates IMPLYING that animal advocates are TOO SMALL of a number to respect but rather r being ignored.WOW: Power corrupts, and ABSOLUTE power CORRUPTS absolutely including Smith, commissioners & the social click known as the DCHS. Thanks for your "concern." JANE smith.
Rebekah Mattox
2:02 pm on Saturday, February 16, 2013
S. Claxton: "... Mr Smith told me himself right when he started, before any of the controversy that a lot of times "directors do not like volunteers because they create opposition" . Looking back, he knew what he was about to orchestrate and I bet he was speaking from experience from opposition he got where he came from!"
real time
10:39 am on Friday, February 15, 2013
some one needs to look in to the wife working with her husband the county code use to read that they could not work in the same department. If it still reads this way sorry one has to leave.the code is open for anyone to read at the court house. But in what im reading most of this is some one did not like how some one ran his job so they quit now the people that know them come on here and and take up for those that quit. Every body should go see for your self at the shelter then we all will know. And no im not with ant of the county people im just some one living in dville
Sadye Claxton
11:10 am on Friday, February 15, 2013
Carl and his wife were Along with the volunteeres of 2012 were so very instrumental in getting tht euthanasia rate to 16%, and Carl has NEVER been threatening to anyone in front of me, and I have seen him in high stress situations. I cannot believe the personal attack on Carl, it's insane. Mr Smith told me himself right when he started, before any of the controversy that a lot of times "directors do not like volunteers because they create opposition" . Looking back, he knew what he was about to orchestrate and I bet he was speaking from experience from opposition he got where he came from!
Rebekah Mattox
7:48 pm on Friday, February 15, 2013
Smith's kill rate in Mo. was close to 55%:Here is a snapshot of Rick Smith's record in the St Josesph, MO shelter from 2009-2012 received via an open records request. Please click on link and note his horrendous kill rate...OVER 50% KILLED UNDER HIS WATCH!!!
Why are county commissioners, the Douglas County Humane Society, and the Animal Control Advisory Board defending Rick Smith with this horrible record? Please do not forget the 70,000 killed animals he acknowledged in a 2008 article: http://www.newspressnow.com/news/article_162accd7-8d00-53d9-be07-82ceed759689.html
The county commissioners like to boast about Douglas county's 16% in 2012, yet they hire a man that subscribes to antiquated philosophies that result in the needless killing of innocent animals.
Hey commissioners, the volunteers you attack, the rescues that built relationships with shelter staff & volunteers, as well as the caring shelter staff that resigned rather than work under Rick Smith gave you that 16% on a silver platter!!! You did little to nothing to earn it, and we did not do it for you...WE DID IT FOR THE ANIMALS!!!
re-posted from FaceBook
Rebekah Mattox
1:44 pm on Saturday, February 16, 2013
“It really makes no sense to pay for a study, implement the suggestions, have great success & then hire someone to dismantle everything & implement his policies that by statistics are a big failure. How/why would the commissioners support this?”
[Karen Luxemburger Orgeron]
SLK
9:25 pm on Saturday, February 16, 2013
FYI everyone: I received a reply to an email I sent to Mike Mulcare with no personal response (coward). All he did was attach a Word document of the BOC's response to the outrage. I replyed with this:
"I’ve read this from the Douglasville Patch. It is nothing more than a bunch of defensive lies.
What do YOU, personally, have to say about any of this, humm?
You can take that and put it where the sun doesn’t shine. I will still NOT VOTE FOR YOU and will tell everyone I can about the horrendous management and misrepresentations of Rick Smith and anyone who supports him.
Regards,"
Tracy Thompson
11:35 pm on Saturday, February 16, 2013
I am one of the employees that left. The county says I left because I could no longer have "my way". Well my way was to give every animal a chance, use all available space to allow them long enough to stay, expect staff to all pull together to care for the animals, come in early on my own time and take animals to the vet, stay late on my own time to take animals to rescue, come in on my day off to assist a rescue or adopter, communicate and know what rescues take what and make sure and call them when we had animals needing rescue, monitor Facebook for anyone looking for lost animals or wanting an animal and matching them up the best I could, getting animals to the vet when needed, asking rescue friends to help with medications so we could medicate all animals needing it without over burdening the budget, use resources sparingly to save funds, do anything in my power to save as many animals as possible. As you can tell in the counties response this is not the "Way" of the new leadership or the county leaders.
Susan Lance
6:24 pm on Sunday, February 17, 2013
Thank you for your service Tracy. You were a huge asset to the people who were trying to save lives.
Tracy Thompson
11:43 pm on Saturday, February 16, 2013
I also can attest that Mr. Pyrdum is a wonderful person, respectful to a fault. He did nothing but spend his own time and money helping the innocent animals that everyone else forgot. For the county officials to attack him in this way is beyond wrong and words cannot express how shocked and disappointed I am in this turn. It makes me ashamed to have been an employee of Douglas County. This reponse should make all citizens of this county furious and they should demand an immediate retraction, apology and the job of whomever is responsible for this display.
Alison Hector
5:50 pm on Monday, February 18, 2013
Exactly Tracy. Thanks for speaking up. You should have been promoted. These are the qualities animal control leadership requires.
Lisa Levesque
7:42 am on Sunday, February 17, 2013
To be clear, Tracy Thompson selflessly served the animals and community. The county lost a true advocate, and her notations above only reference the tip of the iceberg when it comes to her contribution. You are sorely missed Tracy!
The personal attacks on Carl Pyrdum, which have no merit, should be an indicator to all what kind of people we elected into office. We will do well to remember this when they come up for election, as the county deserves better.
Rick Smith does not hold a candle to Tracy or Carl. I believe the real reason he was brought to Douglas county, GA was to push for greater animal control to generate more $$$$. This is the only thing that makes sense to me, as I find no other justification and his actions since being here are indicative of this. So, citizens beware...and keep your animals secure!!!
Rebekah Mattox
3:34 pm on Sunday, February 17, 2013
I am shocked and saddened that DCHS is intimidating volunteers in support of the SLANDEROUS, FALSE BOC statement and in support of someone whose published track record of kill rate is over 50%.
joey casey
9:50 pm on Sunday, February 17, 2013
Douglas Co is a joke, and so is the patch for printing a press release rather than doing their job of reporting. There is no way smith will maintain a low kill rate and his past record proves this. And Tracy and Karl deserve a huge apology as well as the staff who have remained. And then the commissioners and staff need to go! Criminals, liars and murderers! Great job once again government! If you pay off douglas co then you can open up a business there. And then to keep your doors open keep buying the commisioners their favorite expensive wine!
Rebekah Mattox
9:39 am on Monday, February 18, 2013
It is clear that the slander and overall professionalism in this article is part of the lazy, corrupt collusion among leaders in our community. “There comes a time when silence is betrayal.” ~ Martin Luther King, Jr.
http://www.swaylove.org/shelter-retaliation-against-volunteers-is-illegal-unconstitutional
Bruce
4:04 pm on Monday, February 18, 2013
Hey folks, remember that the Special Purpose Option Sales Tax (SPLOST) finally passed by 34 votes after 2 failed attempts?
Hey folks, remember all those flyers that urged you to VOTE?
Hey folks, Douglas County SPLOST was used entirely for one of the largest prisons in the United States, but not a penny went to improving the animal shelter or anything else in the county.
Congratulations to Chairman Worthan, the commissioners and the sheriff!
Thanks to all the people who did not bother to vote and who voted for the prison--YOU GOT WHAT YOU DESERVE!!!!!!!!!!!
Fred
10:06 pm on Monday, February 18, 2013
You are right about the margin of the vote.
You are right about the apathy of the voters.
You are right about where the proceeds of the SPLOST are spent.
You are right about getting what we deserve.
You are way wrong about the DC jail being "one of the largest prisions in the United States". First there is a difference in what a jail is and what a prison is, and the new DC Jail is not even in the top 50 for size nationally - probably not even in the top 100.
It is a shame that the vote did not pass by 100 votes so the backers of the SPLOST could claim a "landslide" win as the backers of the president have with their 51% popular vote victory.
Bruce
4:55 pm on Wednesday, February 20, 2013
I like the way you think, Fred.
However, I disagree about the definition of a jail and a prison.
The new facility is not a county jail. A county jail would have been built within size and cost for what is necessary for Douglas County. That is not what was done.
Sheriff Miller repeatedly stated at public meetings, which have been recorded, that there would be so much empty space at the new facility that he wanted to bring in state and federal prisoners and board them at the new facility to make MONEY.
Therefore, the new prison is just that, a prison.
Too bad there's no room to board and take care of the animals.
James Bell
7:48 am on Friday, February 22, 2013
Mr. Editor, was this document signed by all board members? Was it even signed?
John Barker
7:55 am on Friday, February 22, 2013
No. It was not signed.
Rebekah Mattox
2:51 pm on Friday, February 22, 2013
I remain agahast at this slanderous, unprofessional letter with no identified author and no signatures. It is appalling how reckless and cold the BOC & HS r acting. Additionally, there continues to b pressure for quietness. WHY? Thankfully, Kelly Robinson has called to light his own governing body about the WRONG way Carl was "voted out" of the Animal Ad. Bd which is resulting n an investigation. Further, Tom Worthan at his weekly chat either did not kno or was not truthful n saying he did not kno--claiming that "Southern Hope" just pulled the Fix'Em-Free program without communication ; however, a letter is available dated Feb. 1st from "Southern Hope" explaining the free program was stopped due to R. Smith. The HS did not notify members w/everybody un-informed probably hoping it'd not b learned that this free program was stopped due to R. Smith. This collusion is puzzling & appalling.
James Bell
7:57 am on Friday, February 22, 2013
@BOC - so you want $4 million for an animal shelter? I might consider $2 million if you will consider $2 million for a shelter for homeless humans. DEAL?
Rebekah Mattox
2:42 pm on Friday, February 22, 2013
J. Bell: DEAL! GO FOR THAT SUGGESTION!
James Bell
8:09 am on Friday, February 22, 2013
The best way to facilitate policy change is the change those who are making the policy. The BOC will use the $4 million bond referendum this fall to extinguish criticism and to bring the animal rights folk "into line". The $4 million bond will mean another property tax increase. Do you think the voters will support another tax increase? What alternative are there?
Fred
5:25 pm on Friday, February 22, 2013
How about this alternative to spending $4M (plus the ongoing operating costs and personnel costs) on a new shelter:
Leave the existing shelter as is.
New County Ordinances: All pets in the county require a license - with a condition of the license being that the pet be spayed/neutered and micro-chipped. $2500 fine for possession of a pet without a license. $1000 fine for second pickup of a pet found wandering within the county within a 12 month period. $1000 surrender fee. Have all breeders get a license and post a $20,000 bond - require all pets born under the breeder's control to be chipped within 3 weeks of birth.
Euthanize all feral cats & dogs upon apprehension by Animal Control. These animals would be unadoptable anyway. No chip = feral.
Pets found wandering would be identified by their chip and returned to the owner.
Within a generation (animal, not human) all pets would be registered, sterile and have a home. Animal Control would be limited to collecting and euthanizing feral animals, collecting and returning loose pets and administering the program instituted by the ordinances.
Surrendered pets could be offered to the general public and rescue organizations. At $1000 per pet the program should pay for itself. I would think that the shelter would be nearly empty in a few years.
Since there is no Constitutional right to keep and bear a pet, the ordinances will hold up to legal challenge. Problem solved.
S. R. Shelton
10:47 am on Friday, February 22, 2013
Clearly the ACAB, the BOC, and the Smiths know they have something to hide. If they were honest people, they would conduct themselves in an open, forthright manner. They are fully aware that they are in the wrong. High school student councils have more maturity than this bunch. And more professionalism.
And if the BOC continues to dismiss the opinions of those of us who live outside of Douglas County, they are also dismissing the value of our money spent in Douglas County businesses, and the sales taxes collected thereof. We are not only fully capable of networking for the animals at DCAC, but also for any political opponents they may face for the next election. And we will.
Rebekah Mattox
2:53 pm on Friday, February 22, 2013
Shelton: I hope the BOC cares enough to read comments under their own press release bc your comments are starkingly superb. Thanks!
Fred
5:26 pm on Friday, February 22, 2013
By the way -
All these electrons spent on commenting about an animal shelter.
I wish people would get half as worked up about human homelessness and hunger.
S. R. Shelton
6:07 pm on Friday, February 22, 2013
You are comparing apples to oranges. Just because people are vocal in their concern over homeless animals does not mean they are not equally concerned about human suffering. There is no law, logic, or moral obligation to chose one cause or issue over the other. If the BOC, as entities and as individual members, has shown so little regard for defenseless animals in Douglas County, then they most certainly are incapable of having any for genuine concern or compassion for human suffering either. Why would the BOC care? There's nothing in it for them. After all, homeless people and homeless animals don't vote or pay taxes.
Fred
12:42 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013
There is a limited amount of money that can be spent on anything.
The county spends public funds on the animal shelter and staffing it.
Yet there is no county funding equal to what is spent on the animal shelter for sheltering/feeding humans in this county and no one is vocal about it at all.
The "little regard for defenseless animals" starts with the citizens who allow their pets to remain unsterilized. This entire animal control situation is a COST to the citizens of the county imposed because of uncontrolled pet breeding. Bob Barker is right - get your pet spayed or neutered today - it should be a requirement of ownership just like car insurance is a requirement to operate a vehicle.
As far as the BOC not caring - their job is to manage the County's money as efficiently as possible and to be responsible to the citizens of the County desire for government services. When the ballot issue passes for the $4M shelter - because it will - then the BOC will be responding to the will of citizens. "Caring" does not have anything to do with it.
It is logical and a morally right to choose people over animals. Every time. If you had one bowl of food to feed either a hungry child or a hungry dog what would you do?
What would be better for everyone in Douglas County:
A 0% kill animal control situation. or
A 0% homeless and hungry human situation.
Rebekah Mattox
1:14 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013
Fred: Come out of the clouds away from your idealism. Of course, u r correct on many points, but we have reality not the ideal. We can't even get the BOC to operate in transparency & in many cases to be truthfully forthcoming, so corruption and overall ignorance "trickles down." The tail is like the head! If Worthan dares to say the majority doesn't agree w/animal concerns, he is really saying the majority does not CARE--as does not he. "SOUTHERN HOPE" discontinued the free spay-neuter program because of Rick Smith--he and the BOC should MAKE THAT RIGHT and re-HIRE MIKE POPE since his job performaance was excellent--IN ADDITION TO MS. TRACY of course. YES INDEED SPAY-NEUTER IS ESSENTIAL as r many of your other points which is NOT the topic HERE.
Rebekah Mattox
1:15 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013
Fred: The "SOUTHERN HOPE" letter is available--this is not just an arbitrary claim. Thanks again.
Bruce
4:39 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013
This is GREAT!
Here you are seeing democracy in action, instead of just an unsigned letter purporting to be from the BOC.
And look at the suggestions!
What we are talking about is prioritizing spending, spending money where it is needed!
Tammy Rakestraw Pyrdum
10:21 am on Saturday, March 9, 2013
Here are his numbers from 2008-2012 , provided by the St.Jo Mo Department of Health , Mr. Smith's former boss.
Animals Reclaimed 2706, Animals Adopted 3490, Animals Rescued 144, Animals Euthanized 9658.
The percentages are as follows: 15.8% Reclaimed, 20.41% Adopted, 6.44% DOA,.843 % Rescued and 56.48% Euthanized. The stats no not lie. Over a five year period almost 57% of the animals at the St. Joesph Mo shelter were euthanized. Only 144 were rescued during that time period.
There is NOTHING acceptable about the above numbers. More than HALF of the animals that came into the shelter during that time period were put down. Very sad for the animals. After the killing of 30 animals this week, Douglas County is headed in the same direction.